Thursday, July 28, 2016

Religious Socialism: is this really a socialism?

The rise of global inequality causing super structure to undergo a change on economical stand. It's not a sudden change happned in super struture but across the previous century we can find many such incident of superstructure inheriting or claming principles of socialism. The main super structure claiming the principles of socialism is religion.Our question raises after claims of Pope Francis.

Religious Socialism:

Even Thousands of religion across the globe,our point of discussion going to be only two junior most religion's Christanity and Islam. Our defence aganist this claims is must to bring oppressed class from the cluthes of opressors to the path of scientific socialism.

Christanity Socialism Claim:

Two Years  ago a claim for socialism came from head of 1.2 billion people pope francis. His claim was "I can only say that the communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian. Poverty is at the center of the Gospel,". Is it so communism or socialism is part of christanity teaching?. Pope's claim were based on the prmitive christain society established after christ birth, preachings of apostle and bibilical contents. Even then pope is not the first person to do so the claim but many anti-marxist to claim over centuries.

After death of Jesus christ, 12 disciples or apostle went on preaching message of jesus christ on start of AD in which lots of small community created based on religion. They lived in a society in which all wealth generated were distributed among them based on need and equality.Then on a small society based religious activity developed into  chruch based society.Chruch become co-partners with ruling class,feudal landlords and capitalist. they become main role players in distribution of wealth. Over centuries chruches itself become oppressors of people.So Pope have nothing to blame others rather than his own clan of pope's,bishops,fathers and nuns.

If we come to regilious scripts of christanity,we may find few mention of means of distribution:

It is God's gift to humankind that everyone should eat and drink and take pleasure in all their toil
— (Ecc. 3: 13).
You shall not oppress your neighbour...but you shall love your neighbour as yourself: I am the Lord
— (Lev 19:13, 18)

Even though there are clear mention about mean of distribution, we cant reconize it as socialism. Since claims speaks only about means of distribution but not about means of production which generates the wealth. Among it also we cant find trace of equal means of distribution or distribution based on contribution.
Today's concern of pope over capitalism  and favouring socialism looks strange because francis precessdors pull down mighty socialist blocs to rebulid roman catholic empire.

Islamic socialism claim:

Islamic claim of socialism started much with Muhammad friend Abu Dharr al Ghifare ,since he strongly opposed inequality but modern day Islamic socialism came from islamic reformist leaders like Mustafa Kemel etc. In accordance with claim many socialist,communist and labour parties in Islamic governed states started to adapt socialism within the framework of Islam rather than anti religious Marxist view of socialism. Even today  Arab socialism and al-bhaah socialism predominant socialist principles in middle east and Arab nation rather than a proper scientific socialism . The claim of Islam comes from one of the five pillars of islam(Sahahada,Salat,Zakat,swam,Haji):Zakat

Zakat means a tax. A Muslims in between two lunar calendar or two Ramadan need to donate 2.5% of wealth as charity or tax. In Islam to so called claim of socialism speaks about means of distribution rather than means of production. More over Zakat more complex way of distribution since it as 8  rules in distribution like need to be Muslim, need to be in poverty or beggar or slave or jihad or Zakat collector Etc.

In both religious claims its much of means of distribution and fair amount distribution for lumpenproletariat under such scenario inequality can't be driven out of society. Since means of production like land,factory,tools etc are private which generate massive wealth need to distributed. 

 Religion itself a organization of exploitation, Religions ineffectiveness to bring equality was mainly due to its exploitive nature. Religious claims of means of distribution goes invalid since religion as a organization bounded with land l,wealth,capital etc. To maintain its wealth religion always favoured ruling class,feduals,land lords etc rather than oppressed class. Religion is also breeding place of patriarchy society, since gender equality must to abolish private property. Myth surrounding religious socialism need to be broken for raise of scientific socialism.So Religious socialism can never bring equality on society within the framework of religions.

Source:,Lenin on religion,Rosa Luxembourg on religion,,

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Appraisal System:21st Centuries Exploitation System!!!

In post 1991 period of the technology revolution and the raise of new liberal policies gave way to many new business management concepts. Jack Welch,a former anti employee CEO of GE was the one formalized the most exploitative concept of 21th century in appraisal system. In 1980's Welch introduced a concept to exploit employees in new way know as 'Stack Ranking' or 'Forced Ranking' or 'rank or yank' or 'Forced distribution' or 'Bell Curve' or 'Vitality Curve' etc. It's new concept that introduced to increase competitive environment, Increase production, divide workers unity, In equal distribution of wages, enable firing with poor performer, reduced overall wage rates, Changed work culture and wipe social security.
  The system is implemented by all major corporate across the globe. In India, all new age corporate follow this appraisal concept. During 20th century, across globe there is a problem for corporate with continues raise in fixed hike for all employees and process of unionization. So some mechanism required to minimize this effect of workers unity. The system also creates a isolated work culture and way of life. Appraisal system is not only depends on performance of individual but various others hidden baseless parameters were consider by the managers in appraisal process. Core understanding of this system can be simple stated as "Survival Of the Fittest".

The problem in this system as three perspective as technical flaws,cultural flaws and Indian flaws. This practice based on 80-20 rule and pareto distribution curve.Where some people granted high rating in appraisal process under a category high performance on other hand equal number of people given low rating. The distribution between the two extreme may not be equal like a exact bell curve but something like a power law curve. In between this both extreme variance lies a bulk number of average performers. The distribution of compensation is widely varied across the curve. One more outcome of the process is the sudden promotion's for high performers and pushing out low performers of the company. It's one way were this corporate companies drive out high salaried low perform aged employees and  pull in low salaried young employees. This gives corporate additional chances of pumping in fresh blood of employees into high work time exploitative environment to increase productivity. This complete appraisal process hangs in the decision of the manager. so this process can never be a standard to judge a employees performance since finally its going to be each employees manger going to give force rate. A team of high performance employees can never rate all its employee as high so the manager need to be distribute the rating. This system allows a employee of 10 years experience to be compared with fresher for appraisal process, In noway this way of comparison can give justified rating for employees. It naturally tempt employee with feeling of unworthy decision taken on them will quiet the company, most the companies want this to happen so they can keep getting fresh hands in productivity and destroys the concept of permanent jobs. They tempt for more casual and contract employees.  

   Among employees this system creates negative thought process on fellow employees. The system makes team work a act of dynamics but individuality makes heavy production. The competitive environment developed by this system make every employee too fight individual proving them for salary hike rather than collective bargaining of union for common hike in 20th century. So employees started to involve in isolated act of production This process created culture started to reflect in social life of the employees. They started to think about there social problem in isolated environment and solve it individual  rather than united approach of solving a social problem. It creates a attitude of superior for people with high performance and a stressful depression state for people in low performance cadre. This system also stagnant employees mind from developing them self rather then allow to experience new ideas.

  In one way technically the system is wrong and other way system in cultural flaw. In India the system is further biased by some geographical identities. As I wrote previously the complete system hangs in the hands of employees manager decision, mangers are like slave lords in India. Indian Managers are mostly biased in decision making during appraisal process. The parameter is not alone performance based in India it dependent on Manager's tit for tat , Manager's favoritism, caste, region, language, religion ,gender etc. Indian managers are mostly upper caste Hindu male dominated people seated to rate a diverse spectrum of employees. Most of the people getting this good rating/promotion are from upper caste is that mean other caste people not talented. It's biased nature to pull up people of there orgin strongly exists in work culture. Managers use it as assault weapon to employees in wrong terms with him/her to rate low. Women's have additional problem from there male bosses as in the form harassment. They were not aware its a harassment but they need to keep quite. Women employee were saturated after certain level of hierarchy. Is it happen naturally? No, our common Indian male attitude about women saturating them from progress.  A women's are not qualified to do more than this work is deep imprinted in most of the male managers. This system completely wiped the rebel sprite of employees to question the managers of wrong doings.

  Jack welch introduced this system into GE corporation the productivity increased to pinnacle. During his tenure of CEO, company value rose by 4000% but other side employees were regularly thrown out with poor performer brand. One sample of GE is enough to show case how much this appraisal system driven company value. Actually this growth not reflected in big deal in employee salary and job security of the employees. The system can make employee to feel good but overall this appraisal system is a new way of exploitation of employees labor. It's the reason every time a employees union formed in a corporate office first demand would be wipe out appraisal system. So the solution for it may be common fixed hike for all employees based on there seniority. Open promotion policy based on seniority and single window system. To achieve this Employee union is must for our collective bargaining.  Let keep marching towards a society without exploitation by keep uprooting system like this on the path. 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...